Integration AsanaĪny tool that supports a good number of integrations makes teams' jobs hassle-free. Ease of Use ConclusionĪsana, as a project management tool, has a number of user-interface navigations to work on project tasks, while Slack being a team collaboration tool has fewer hops. Those settings would include workspace sign-up mode and language, display name guidelines, default channels, etc., The best part is that the users have the provision to integrate into App Directory right from the user-side application itself. Workspace settings can be managed from the administration section of each workspace. Getting Started with Slack - Tips, Tricks & More If we consider a simple-to-use and easy-to-understand user interface to be one of the key performance indicators of measurement of any team collaboration tool, then Troop Messenger comes stands first in the row. Though it is not as extensive as Asana, the UX is a little confusing. The user interface of Slack is quite appealing and impressive. Find my favorites, reports, teams, projects, team calendar, and more projects from here. Team and Project management features are seen on the sidebar of the Asana application home page. It lets you create tasks and to-dos, add sections to organize your tasks, set start date and end date to tasks, and add an assignee to tasks to track the project progress. The user interface is neatly designed and is highly self-explorable. Ease of Use AsanaĬreating projects and tracking those projects' tasks are simple and easy at Asana. Sign-up process of Asana completes in a few steps, while more steps are involved in Slack. Slack gives a project name for each channel, directly log in to the application with your workspace URL, catch up to innumerable integrations, and talk to Slack bots with many more interesting features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |